{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Dataset","name":"WordPress VIP Assessment Methodology","description":"Scoring methodology for enterprise CMS compatibility assessment","version":"1.0","dateModified":"2025-12-11","methodology":{"totalQuestions":10,"scoringDimensions":[{"name":"Scalability","weight":0.25,"description":"Evaluates traffic handling capacity, uptime requirements, and infrastructure scaling needs","factors":["Monthly traffic volume","Uptime SLA requirements","Number of digital properties"]},{"name":"Security","weight":0.2,"description":"Assesses compliance requirements and security feature needs","factors":["GDPR compliance","SOC 2 Type I","FedRAMP authorization","PCI-DSS","DDoS protection"]},{"name":"Cost Savings","weight":0.2,"description":"Projects potential savings from platform migration","factors":["Current CMS platform","Hosting type","Maintenance overhead","Team size"]},{"name":"Flexibility","weight":0.15,"description":"Evaluates multisite needs and integration requirements","factors":["Number of sites","Current platform constraints","Vendor lock-in concerns"]},{"name":"Developer Experience","weight":0.2,"description":"Assesses team workflow efficiency and developer productivity","factors":["Team size","Content workflow bottlenecks","Developer availability"]}],"scoreRange":{"minimum":50,"maximum":98,"interpretation":{"90-100":"Excellent fit - WordPress VIP strongly recommended","75-89":"Great fit - significant benefits from migration","60-74":"Good fit - notable advantages over current platform","50-59":"Moderate fit - some benefits available"}}}}